Manhattan GMAT Guided Self Study Prep Plus
| 4 reviews |
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Purchased Course: Aug 2011
Industry: Food/Beverage
Country: United States
Verified Real Student Review
|
Manhattan GMAT rocks!
Recommended for —
Verbal: Yes
Math: Yes
GMAT Scores —
Before:
N/A
After:
730
I started with a 670 on my diagnostic test and Manhattan GMAT got me to a 730 in a matter of a few weeks. I did the guided self-study course so I could focus on the areas I needed improvement rather than doing broad strokes through all the material. The course was set up in an easy-to-access manner. The syllabus was simple to follow and each lesson built upon the previous ones. Manhattan GMAT tech support was available and helpful when needed. The result: I was able to watch all the videos I wanted. How did the videos work you ask? Great. The videos had no problems playing on my Mac and I appreciated being able to fast forward through material I felt I understood. As for the content, the videos will not provide in-depth mastery, but they do provide an excellent 5,000 ft overview that can be the difference between one more "correct" answer and one more "wrong" answer. The instructors (Dan Patinkin & Dan Gonzalez) clearly mastered the material and had no trouble imparting their GMAT wisdom. As for the books, Manhattan GMAT makes it easy to do the types of problems you need by breaking listing where you can find what problem type/topic. Further, the material itself is easily understood and has abundant practice problems to challenge your understanding of the material in questions that are sometimes harder than you will find on the GMAT. Bottom line: Manhattan GMAT is a strong recommend. Don't sell yourself short by trying to save a few dollars, go with Manhattan GMAT and maximize your chances at the score you want. |
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Purchased Course: Jul 2010
College: Bucknell University
Major: Accounting
Verified Real Student Review
|
Build a solid foundation and learn the best strategies.
Company: Manhattan GMAT 243 reviews
Location: Manhattan GMAT - Washington, D.C. 20 reviews Teacher: Stacey Koprince
Recommended for —
Verbal: Yes
Math: Yes
GMAT Scores —
Before:
N/A
After:
750
Frist, I am a very picky shopper, and I researched extensively before settling with MGMAT. I am very happy with the result as I made a vast improvement on verbal. If you take a full advantage of MGMAT's resources, you will solidify your base knowledge on all aspect of GMAT and learn a great deal of effective strategies. Keep up with the syllabus and complete everything in the curriculum. Rest is up to you. Practice!! Practice!! Practice!! Math: 49 Verbal: 42 Insturctor: Good luck everyone who wish to beat the GMAT. Thank you Stacey and Ron from MGMAT!! |
|
Verified Real Student Review
|
indispensable
Recommended for —
Verbal: Yes
Math: Yes
GMAT Scores —
Before:
550
After:
700
In my MBA applications, I had a focus on my GMAT score: I got 700 and I entered the only school I applied for. As English is not my first langage and I left school years ago, I was nervous about the goal of 700 or above that I had put on my shoulder. Actually I registered to two preps: Manathan GMAT and Knewton, as I was too nervous. Manathan GMAT has an amazing material with their books: outstanding; it is a lot of work to go through all of them and to retain anything but it is very useful. I liked the class too as you are given tricks: there you are learning the GMAT langage; You learn to recognize how it works and what is the thinking pattern, why you are making so many errors: I enjoyed this part immensely and I saved a lot of study time. The classes has brought me a lot. It is there that I understood what it is all about and I also gained confidence with my level of English: confidence is very important for this exam which is a psychological challenge more than anything else. The teacher mastered the subject and was dedicated to the class: I have saved a lot of time learning from her. I just regretted that we didn't make more difficult problems (level above 700) but I understood that if you don't master the basis you are loosing your time and money: you have to build your strength one step at a time. Compared to Knewton, the registered session on Internet are not good to my mind: it is not lively and I got bored after 10 minutes. That I didn't like and that's a minus for the prep. But a friend thought that Veritas was as horrible or more for the registered session. So I am guessing that there Manathan is average, where Knewton has specialised in having lively recordings. Knewton also gives a lot of tricks: my feeling is that with Manathan - regular session - you can go to 700 but it will be hard to go over, while Knewton seems to give you the material to go over but if you don't assimilate the base properly, you won't reach 700 even, so for that I prefer Manathan GMAT: it is serious and you can go step by step, no matter what is your level at the beginning. As a non native English speaking I definitly enjoyed Manathan GMAT as it is easy to follow. I would have like to have a prep specifically to go over the 700: I think it is not that difficult: it was worth for me working on it with Manathan GMAT; I don't think I would have managed by myself and I would have got discouraged, not understanding why I made so many errors, especially on the verbal but also on the math part. I am thankful for that prep: I am now where I wanted to go. |
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Forum Posts: 3 Purchased Course: Jul 2009
College: California State University, Fresno
Major: Business
Industry: Student
Country: United States
Verified Real Student Review
|
I wanted to like it
Recommended for —
Verbal: No
Math: No
GMAT Scores —
Before:
N/A
After:
540
I decided to go with MGMAT because of the numerous positive reviews that I had seen. I decided to go with the self-study prep plus (for budget reasons). This was where the program went south... I was inundated with information and no way to know which part(s) were critical to understand. Math was my weak point here... I do excellent in college-based math courses (got an "A" in every class I took) because the information is fresh and focused. However, this isn't the case with standardized tests. I knew I needed suggestions and information about how and where to focus my efforts for the GMAT. This self-guided study was lackluster and incredibly unfocused. Overall, I feel as if the books were incredibly informative, but, seeing as you're studying on your own, you're bound to get lost in the information. Basically, I had nobody to guide me throughout the whole ordeal. What little interaction I did have with instructors (1 hour) was useless. (The teacher was incredibly rude.) The math books were quite thorough. I feel that these books would have been incredibly informative had there been a teacher thoroughly explaining problems and concepts. The sentence correction book was also decent. However, the CR and RC books were quite useless. I didn't learn a single thing from either of these books. I feel as if a live class or an in-person class would be vastly superior to anything self-based. I wish I had taken the class in a different format. I feel like the course had potential, but without the guidance, this potential was never realized. I'll be taking my next prep course with Knewton. |
